Friday, November 12, 2004

On forgiveness

At first, I thought the idea behind www.sorryeverybody.com was a great idea, and I thought it was cute. But, the Website has much greater implications than I realized. There is this cumulative effect of seeing person after person asking for forgiveness from the rest of the World. Person after person was asking for compassion, and help, and forgiveness from mother earth, our allies, and from other countries around the globe.

The disturbing part, for me at least, is that there some of the messages have an edge that slices deeper than just losing the election.

  • "2 paychecks, 50+ hours of work, and only 1 vote."
  • "Sorry that the youth of America failed the youth of the World."
  • "Dear World, We're sorry . We tried. Please forgive us. Love, Pennsylvania"
  • "Sorry world, I wish I had a safer place to play, too." (from a child)
  • "Sorry We're Stupid"
  • "Dear World, I am sorry, too. I wish my vote had counted. --The Next Generation"
  • "RIP Democracy: 1776 - 2004"
  • "A little less than half of my neighbors and I would like to apologize for failing you. --Ohio"
After 10 pages filled with pictures, I realized that I was on the brink of tears. Deeper than that, the idea behind the Website struck a chord that resonated deeply within me. A few more pages of pictures, and I was sobbing terribly.

I want forgiveness from the world, too. I am ashamed of the actions of my country. If left unguided, I know that the ship that is our world will continue on the wrong course. My leader is Captain Ahab chasing after the white whale, and he doesn't care if he kills us all to get it.

Dear World,

Please forgive me, too. I am not leaving America. They need me here--even if they don't know it. And, I am staying to help.

-Tim

Labels:

A short intermission (and Sorry Everybody)

I apologize for my temporary lapse in entries. It is the birthday-time of the year for me, and I will be incognito for a couple of days celebrating the last 365 days, and the next 365 days.

In the meantime, I have an amazing link for you. It is our apologies to the world. Real people giving their apologies to the world. Half of us ARE TRULY SORRY! Go to the gallery and see the faces and the messages of those who feel compelled to apologize for the actions of our leaders (the leaders who are not representing the wishes of the people).

http://www.sorryeverybody.com/

Entries will be spotty (at best) for the next couple of days. I will be back weilding my mighty pen in full strength by Monday.

Labels:

Thursday, November 11, 2004

This is going around on the net, and it is amazing!

[My note: The author of this letter is an amazing America. You will always be welcome on my blog. ]

I have not been able to confirm the author of this letter

Written by a woman in New York. Think it echoes what most of us in New York
think and feel about the state of our country. After the letter was
published, the woman started receiving death threats.


Letter To The Red States:

Sorry, I try not to deluge people with my ramblings. But I had to write this
and, having written it, had to send it. Even though I don't know anyone I
can send it to (without alienating my Republican in-laws, who are the only
"middle country" people I know.)

I am writing this letter to the people in the red states in the middle of
the country -- the people who voted for George W. Bush. I am writing this
letter because I don't think we know each other.

So I'll make an introduction. I am a New Yorker who voted for John Kerry. I
used to live in California, and if I still lived there, I would vote for
Kerry. I used to live in Washington, DC, and if I still lived there, I would
vote for Kerry. Kerry won in all three of those regions.

Maybe you want to know more about me. Or maybe not; maybe you think you know
me already. You think I am some anti-American anarchist because I dislike
George W. Bush. You think that I am immoral and anti-family, because I
support women's reproductive freedom and gay rights. You think that I am
dangerous, and even evil, because I do not abide by your religious beliefs.

Maybe you are content to think that, to write me off as a "liberal" -- the
dreaded "L" word -- and rejoice that your candidate has triumphed over evil,
immoral, anti-American, anti-family people like me. But maybe you are still
curious. So here goes: this is who I am.

I am a New Yorker. I was here, in my apartment downtown, on September 11th.
I watched the Towers burn from the roof of my building. I went inside so
that I couldn't see them when they fell. I had friends who were inside. I
have a friend who still has nightmares about watching people jump and fall
from the Towers. He will never be the same. How many people like him do you
know? People that can't sit in a restaurant without plotting an escape
route, in case it blows up?

I am a worker. I work across the street from the Citigroup Center, which the
government told us is a "target" of terrorism. Later, we found out they were
relaying very old information, but it was already too late. They had given
me bad dreams again. The subway stop near my office was crowded with
bomb-sniffing dogs, policemen in heavy protective gear, soldiers. Now, every
time I enter or exit my office, all of my possessions are X-rayed to make
sure I don't have any weapons. How often are you stopped by a soldier with a
bomb-sniffing dog outside your office?


I am a neighbor. I have a neighbor who is a 9/11 widow. She has two
children. My husband does odd jobs for her now, like building bookshelves.
Things her husband should do. He uses her husband's tools, and the two
little girls tell him, "Those are our daddy's tools." How many 9/11 widows
and orphans do you know? How often do you fill in for their dead loved ones?

I am a taxpayer. I worked my butt off to get where I did, and so did my
parents. My parents saved and borrowed and sent me to college. I worked my
way through graduate school. I won a full tuition scholarship to law school.
All for the privilege of working 2,600 hours last year. That works out to a
50 hour week, every week, without any vacation days at all. I get to work by
9 am and rarely leave before 9 pm. I eat dinner at my office much more often
than I eat dinner at home. My husband and I paid over $70,000 in federal
income tax last year. At some point in the future, we will have to pay much
more -- once this country faces its deficit and the impossible burden of
Social Security. In fact, the areas of the country that supported Kerry --
New York, California, Illinois, Massachusetts -- they are the financial
centers of the nation. They are the tax base of this country. How much did
you pay, Kansas? How much did you contribute to this government you support,
Alabama? How much of this war in Iraq did you pay for?

I am a liberal. The funny part is, liberals have this reputation for living
in Never-Neverland, being idealists, not being sensible. But let me tell you
how I see the world: I see America as one nation in a world of nations.
Therefore, I think we should try to get along with other nations. I see that
gay people exist. Therefore, I think they should be allowed to exist, and be
treated the same as other people. I see ways in which women are not allowed
to control their own bodies. Therefore, I think we should give women more
control over their bodies. I see that people have awful diseases. Therefore,
I think we should enable scientists to try to cure them. I see that we have
a Constitution. Therefore, I think it should be upheld. I see that there
were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Therefore, I think that Iraq
was not an imminent danger to me. It seems so pragmatic to me. How do you
see the world? Do you really think voting against gay marriage will keep
people from being gay? Would you really prefer that people continue to die
from Parkinson's disease? Do you really not care about the Constitutional
rights of political detainees? Would you really have supported the war if
you knew the truth, or would you have wanted to spend more of our money on
health care, job training, terrorism preparedness?

I am an American. I have an American flag flying outside my home. I love my
home more than anything. I love that I grew up right outside New York City.
I first went to the Statue of Liberty with my 5th grade class, and my mom
and dad took me to the Empire State Building when I was 8. I love taking the
subway to Yankee Stadium. I loved living in Washington DC and going on dates
to the Lincoln Memorial. It is because I love this country so much that I
argue with my political opponents as much I do.

I am not safe. I never feel safe. My in-laws live in a small town in Ohio,
and that town has received more federal funding, per capita, for terrorism
preparedness than New York City has. I take subways and buses every day. I
work in a skyscraper across the street from a "target." I have emergency
supplies and a spare pair of sneakers in my desk, in case something happens
while I'm at work. Do you? How many times a month do you worry that your
subway is going to blow up? When you hear sirens on the street, do you run
to the window to make sure everything is okay? When you hear an airplane, do
you flinch? Do you dread beautiful, blue-skied September days? I don't know
a single New Yorker who doesn't spend the month of September on tip-toes,
superstitiously praying for rain so we don't have to relive that beautiful,
blue-skied day.

I am lonely. I feel that we, as a nation, have alienated all our friends and
further provoked our enemies. I feel unprotected. Most of all I feel
alienated from my fellow citizens, because I don't understand what you are
thinking. You voted for a man who started a war in Iraq for no reason,
against the wishes of the entire world. You voted for a man whose lack of
foresight and inability to plan has led to massive insurgencies in Iraq,
where weapons are disappearing into the hands of terrorists. You voted for a
man who let Osama Bin Laden escape into the hills of Afghanistan so that he
could start that war in Iraq. You voted for a man who doesn't want to let
people love who they want to love; doesn't want to let doctors cure their
patients; doesn't want to let women rule their destinies. I don't understand
why you voted for this man. For me, it is not enough that he is personable;
it is not enough that he seems like one of the guys. Why did you vote for
him? Why did you elect a man that lied to us in order to convince us to go
to war? (Ten years ago you were incensed when our president lied about his
sex life; you thought it was an impeachable offense.) Why did you elect a
leader who thinks that strength cannot include diplomacy or international
cooperation? Why did you elect a man who did nothing except run away and hide
on September 11?

Most of all, I am terrified. I mean daily, I am afraid that I will not
survive this. I am afraid that I will lose my husband, that I will never
have children, that I will never grow old and watch the sunset in a backyard
of my own. I am afraid that my career -- which should end with a triumphant
and good-natured roast at a retirement party in 2035 -- will be cut short by
an attack on me and my colleagues, as we sit sending emails and making phone
calls one ordinary afternoon. Is your life at stake? Are you terrified?

I don't think you are. I don't think you realize what you have done. And if
anything happens to me or the people I love, I blame you. I wanted you to
know that.

"From what we get, we can make a living; what we give, however, makes a
life." - Arthur Ashe

Labels:

Tuesday, November 09, 2004

CalTech Releases Report that there is no evidence of Voting Machine Fraud

It appears as if CalTech has examined the relationship between the exit polls discrepency and the use of Electronic Voting polls. They have a report that claims that there is not a correlation between the two.

You can find the report and a summary of the article on Al Franken's blog: http://www.ofrankenfactor.com/

The entry is titled: EXIT POLLS AS EVIDENCE OF VOTER FRAUD? EXPERTS WEIGH IN...

I know that I have added a link to Right Wing News earlier today, and I posted this tonight. It does not mean that I am not Liberal. I am still forwarding a progressive-thinking agenda. But, I have been mixing news releases within my own opinion posts. I do not have the time, and it is not my calling to be a source of News. It is, however, my place and desire to post my opinions. All along, I have been asking for someone to confirm or deny the news allegations that the vote count had been tampered.

I have heard rumors (please recognize that these are separate from FACTS) that Major media was ordered to be silent about the process. I have not heard this corroborated anywhere else. It also appears that BlackBoxVoting.Org has exceeded their bandwidth allocation--which could be a good thing or a bad thing.

In all fairness, I refuse to jump to conclusions. We need to keep asking tough questions, and we need to be prepared for answers that we don't want to hear. Just keep asking the questions.

Labels:

On Diversity

Last night, I did some research. I wandered the Internet for quite some time--skipping from Blog to Blog and reading random thoughts and ideas. I discovered a really interesting collective batch of people, thoughts, and writing. I stumbled across a handful of personal Websites, a nice collection of Liberal blogs, and a few college collectives.

The most notable of all fo the Websites that I discovered in my short journey was the Website: www.rightwingnews.com. First, and most importantly, the writing was good. It was focused, succinct, and had a very specific audience. The language was clear, and the author employed language in a powerful and exemplary manner.

In addition to the writing and the structure itself, the content was actually quite noteworthy. It is extremely conservative, but it exemplifies the constituency that we (the Democratic party) supposedly could not reach. In addition, they actually have several entries (including one on the homepage) addressed specifically to Progressive thinkers. It is a recipe (from their perspective) for how to reach middle America. Of course, their analogies are filled with stereotypes, but whenever you use persuasion in your writing, you SHOULD have some bias embedded within your language.

The other thing that impressed me about the writing was that they addressed the President directly. The authors are distinctly aware of their position as the power base of President Bush, and they demand that he address their specific wants--which are not altogether too far from my own desires for government. They, in fact, demand that he align his policies with their ideals: get the spending under control, diminish the size of the government (not increase it), and control the influx of immigrants. All three of their points are good in my opinion.

Although some people may not agree, I have added them as a link on the blog. Diversity of opinion, viewpoint, and beliefs are important to the Democracy that I support and love. So, I am going to practice that right here in my teensy, little corner of the Blog-o-sphere.

Labels: ,

Monday, November 08, 2004

More Data Streaming In--This Time from Princeton

This is a high-level look at the Data. There is a lengthly link list at the end.

Electoral College Meta-Analysis (election.princeton.edu)

From Prof. Sam Wang of Princeton University.

http://synapse.princeton.edu/~sam/pollcalc.html

Labels:

Inside the Precinct: A First-person Perspective

This is a great article! Avi Rubin is a Computer Science Professor at Johns Hopkins Univeristy who worked at a Precinct during this years 2004 Presidential Election. He re-tells his experiences, voices his concerns, and speculates about the implications of the voting machines.

This is a spectacular article!

http://www.avirubin.com/judge2.html


Labels:

Miracles Can Happen (In Florida)

The Bible belt called, and Lord answered. He performed a miracle right here in the USA! To be more specific, there is this little article . . . .

Palm Beach County Logs 88,000 More Votes Than Voters
November 5, 2004, in the Washington Dispatch

http://www.washingtondispatch.com/spectrum/archives/000715.html

What a touching story . . . .

Labels:

Warren County Details hit the Big Screen--sorta

November 7, 2004
George, John, and Warren (by Keith Olbermann)

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6210240

Keith Olbermann for MSNBC reported yesterday that the telephone call made by John Kerry to concede the election does not represent anything binding or legal. He also recognized the Warren County, OH instance where they cited Homeland Security concerns and counted the votes behind locked doors.

I hope that this hits the mainstream and someone puts it to rest, or validates this.

Labels:

Kerry can UN-Conceed the Election (and just might)

There is an a letter that was sent and posted on www.bushflash.com/ supposedly from a DC Lawyer. She said that Kerry can un-concede the election as long as it is before the final counting of the votes in Ohio. She also asked that if you have any evidence of someone intimidating you, or having to wait more that 4 hours to vote, or anything else (there were allegations that in some neighborhoods populated mostly with African-Americans, that there were as few as 2 voting machines for an entire district, and that some voters were told to return on Wednesday to vote--that the deadline had been extended that long), that you should send an e-mail to a specific lawyer.

Please read it for yourself--it is on the homepage of www.bushflash.com (including the e-mail address). The writer behind BushFlash is verifying the validity of that e-mail.


Labels:

I Wonder What the UK Thinks of USA

In case you were wondering what the UK thinks of the Election, here is an editorial from a legitimate news source in the UK.

GOD HELP AMERICA
Published on November 5th in Mirror.Co.Uk

Warning: This editorial is not for the squeamish-of-heart . . . .


Labels:

Goodbye Ethos

I feel bad for the conservatives that I know. They are (in general, there are exceptions, of course) inflicted with a terrible disease. I call it apathy. Often times, they call it the "if-it-ain't-broke, don't fix it" way. Like that mantra is a life choice, or a biological pre-disposition that characterizes your mental space, or perhaps a path that one chooses and cannot return.

But, I want to properly name that dragon. Apathy is too abstract. There is not enough research and fact checking going on within the conservative circles. There is not enough independent verification. And, it is apathetic on the part of the conservatives. At least the conservatives that I know.

There used to be a time when the population could have a great deal of faith in what was being given to us by the Media, our leaders, and public figures. The Ethos that a person had just for being on Television or on the radio was great enough to allow us to believe it as a credible source. No more! As special interest money has understood the value of that implied legitimacy, they have appropriated that as a medium for distributing deceitful messages disguised as truth. And, the partisan news sources that use the medium to influence the opinions of apathetic Americans has nearly reached epic proportions.

Jon Stewart attempted to make that very point in his appearance on Crossfire, and in his book I presume (It is on my reading list--I haven't got there, yet.). He appeared on the show for an opportunity to promote his book, and because he was a comedian (and Jon Stewart), he was by himself. His intentions for appearing on Crossfire were clear seconds after the opening statements. He attacked the hosts for providing biased information disguised as non-partisan debate. He went on to appeal to their sense of moral responsibility as journalists--that it is their ethical obligation to shift the values of their show to be more consistent with the truth than with their particular partisan politics--OR, (he gave them another option) correctly identify your show as theatre and not news.

This is just one example of the former credibility--the Ethos--that has evaporated from American politics. The closer the politics aligns itself with politics, the more that ethos is going to evaporate. When politics is related to the bottom-line of a corporation, deceptive practices will be used. Ever met a used car salesman?

My point is that the people (and news sources) vying for the conservative support are manipulating the conservatives. And, everyone that I know in that conservative boat still have a blanket faith in the credibility of the person and/or news source. It's like Captain Ahab telling the crew that we are not looking for the white whale, and thinking, "Well, he's the Captain--he must be telling the truth."

Labels:

Sunday, November 07, 2004

Unidentified Election Blips on the Trouble Radar

There are a couple of terrible reports showing up on the radar. I do not know if they are true, or not. I hope the mainstream media does their job and researches and either dispels this myth, or affirms the truth. Each of these articles has serious implications:


1.) Published on Saturday, November 6, 2004 by CommonDreams.org
Evidence Mounts That The Vote May Have Been Hacked by Thom Hartmann

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1106-30.htm

This Common Dreams article has a couple of important elements in it that raised warning signals for me. The first is that on television, the founder of BlackBoxVoting.Org had Howard Dean hack the result of a Diebold Machine in less than 90 seconds--without any traces. She provides the "How" for the conspiracy theory (or one of them). In addition, they uncover some common voting irregularities in Florida.

2.) Glitch gave Bush extra votes in Ohio
Friday, November 5, 2004 Posted: 4:15 PM EST (2115 GMT)

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/11/05/voting.problems.ap/index.html

In this CNN article, a mainstream news organization actually provides an example of problems. Isn't anyone else investigating this?

3.) Board awaits state followup
By ERIN MILLER

http://www.theeveningleader.com/articles/2004/11/06/news/news.01.txt

This is a smaller news source, but in The Evening Leader of St. Marys, OH, they reported that a former employee of ES&S (the company that programmed the voting machines) was working on the machines. I guess his presence on the system was prohibited by the election guidelines/policies. They are awating information about an investigation, but have not heard anything from Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell's office.

This is another example of tampering. You cannot make a generalization from a specific example--it is a logical fallacy. As the evidence continues to stream in, however, perhaps the amount of evidence warrants an invesigation by the FBI?

4.) Black Box Voting

http://www.blackboxvoting.org/

On the homepage of BlackBoxVoting.Org, they interviewed the independent company that tested the software on the voting machines. According to the report, the cosultants did not review the security or potential vulnerabilities within the systems. After the NASED (National Association of State Election Directors) received the report, they certified the machines anyway.

I wish that the group were a little more serious. The article has pictures of young adults (presumably the Web designers) embedded within their article asking silly spin-off questions. I guess they did not want to seem legitimate (one of the comments is a spin-off of the National Enquirer's former advertisement). If the content of their article is potentially true, the implications are pretty bad.

5.) KERRY WON. HERE ARE THE FACTS. TomPaine.com
Friday Nov 5, 2004 by Greg Palast

http://www.gregpalast.com/

This article is pretty disturbing. Remember Katherine Harris? She was the famous Florida election supervisor that eliminated 179,855 votes erroneously from Florida in the 2004 elections. I guess they are called "spoiled" votes, and they are discarded for various reasons. Kenneth Blackwell's office spoiled 1.96% (110,000) of Ohio's votes. Greg Palast calls it a "Democracy-damaging" number. In addition, there were somewhere between 175,000 - 250,000 uncounted provisional ballots. The spoilage in New Mexico was 18,000 votes, and Bush won by 11,620. Most of the "spoiled" voters cast Democratic ballots.

6.) New Florida vote scandal feared
By Greg Palast Reporting for Newsnight

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/3956129.stm

Here is another article by Greg Palast published at BBC.com. This was before the election. There were some e-mails that were intercepted with a list of names, and it was possible that it would be used as a target list to intimidate voters.

The interesting thing in this article is the rebuttle and the subsequent rebuttle. Also, someone anonymously hired a private investigator to film the voters in certain areas with a high concentration of African-Americans.

We now know that voter intimidation was a factor with the Republican Party resurrecting the Ku Klux Klan laws that were passed years ago to place party-designated challengers within the polling place.


If there is anyone with the power to investigate these allegations, please do so--and confirm or deny the rumors going around. I wish transparency would return to our society.

Labels: